Zimbabwe Elections – Policies Determined the Outcome

The MDC losers of the election in Zimbabwe and their backers explain the victory of ZANU as the result of election fraud. The outcome, however was widely predicted by polls and commentary in Africa.

ZANU had an inherent advantage bacause it is the liberation party. Since the intervention by the African Union in 2009, which led to a coalition government between ZANU and the MDC, peace, calm and stability has been restored and the economy has seen an impressive recoverery.

Average GDP growth since 2010 is 7% with inflation at 2.2%. Government revenues have grown from 16% of GDP to 36% of GDP. This has allowed the restoration of public services.

ZANU used the period to organize, while the MDC was deeply divided with two of its leaders standing in the election. Tsvangirai’s love life was much in the news, with a judge preventing a second marriage, by threatening him with jail for bigamy. The wedding ceremony still went ahead, but without signing the registry.

The most important factor, however, was the policies on which the parties campaigned. ZANU completed the land transfer to Africans. 125,000 small farmers received land and 50,000 larger smallholders received larger plots. With government help, food production stabilized and grew and many in the countryside increased their incomes.

The Lancaster Agreement with the UK had provided for financial assistance in land transfer to Africans, with fair compensation to the white land owners. The Blair government reneged on the agreement, which resulted in the difficulties seen at the start, as ZANU went ahead with implementation.

ZANU’s election platform was ‘indigenization’, aimed at 51% African ownership of all Zimbabwean firms. In contrast the MDC platform was a neoliberal agenda, aiming to attract foreign corporations to invest and create jobs. Bad experiences of this throughout Africa made that policy unpopular and many people voted accordingly.

The Workers’ Party Twitter Feed

Trump has said if they manages to keep the death toll to 100,000, they’d be doing a “very good job.” Instead of protecting US citizens, his administration launches a campaign of misinformation & anti-China conspiracy theories blaming China for Covid19.
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/04/01/us-conspiracy-theory-on-china-coronavirus-trump/#more-22821

Economically speaking we would expect food prices to go up Overall social cost of production is higher since the social wage has necessarily gone up Millions of workers are not working & yet, strangely for capitalism they are paid, albeit less than before
https://theworker.org.uk/

Shut the Sites! call for building sites to close, so that building workers do not become infected by COVID 19. Construction magnates have too much influence over the government.
Penalties set by large corporations for late completion, must be banned
https://www.union-news.co.uk/coronavirus-will-spread-like-wildfire-workers-calls-for-construction-sites-to-be-shut/

We are living in difficult times, being encouraged to socially distance ourselves. It is essential that our union organisation remains intact. Indeed, in this environment our collective organisations are not only needed but should be made to thrive. https://digital.tuc.org.uk/working-remotely-for-trade-unions/

Load More...

Meta


All text on this site is copyright The Workers' Party of Britain. Established 2006