When are Local Public Services not Local Public Services?

……. when there’s a profit to be made and accountability is destroyed. The eventual conclusion of the ongoing Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations between the US and EU will accelerate the privatisation of public services.

Discredited multinational corporations such as Capita relish the prospect of making millions or billions out of acquiring contracts to deliver services previously provided by workers employed directly by the local authorities. Tories say they are saving public money, but there is very little evidence of this, especially when these large multinationals are in the business of making profit out of public money. Companies like this will charge premium amounts for every tiny detail of provision.

Tory controlled Barnet is leading the charge to destroy local public services. They reduced the staff from 3,200 to 332. Northamptonshire is pursuing a similar course. Those of us unfortunate enough to live in Tory controlled areas can expect more of the same if there is no effective opposition.

In Barnet Capita were given the contract to run local services for the next ten years ,denying Barnet residents the opportunity to complain. Capita now maintain that information about public services is ‘commercially sensitive’. So much for government’s ‘localism’ – so much for local democracy.

The Workers’ Party Twitter Feed

GMB express concern over jobs of 146,000 staff; as Walmart sell Asda to billionaire Issa brothers & a private equity company. Asda is priced at £6.8 billion, Walmart will still hold a minority stake; £4b is to be borrowed.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/oct/02/asda-sold-to-billionaire-issa-brothers

Liberals & many on the 'left' exaggerate differences between Trump & Biden; click to see what would make a real difference.
There is no effective “freedom” in a society in which working people live in poverty & billionaires live like parasites.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10221826359541925&id=1045558919&sfnsn=scwspmo

Biden opposed moves to rebuild Afghanistan, advising a policy of fighting terrorism in the country. He also opposed withdrawal of US troops, which Trump carried out.
https://tolonews.com/afghanistan/biden’s-comments-rile-afghans-internationals

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Biden's regime will hold on to enclaves in the North East and work alongside Turkish invaders, continuing sanctions against the Syrian government. In general, Biden wants US global leadership, which he sees as being diminished by Trump's inconsistencies.
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/limited-and-constrained-the-biden-administration-and-the-prospects-of-a-syria-policy/

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Biden intends to have tighter sanctions on DPRK, and to have stricter preconditions with respect to engaging on talks. The Democrat's president also intends to strengthen an alliance against North Korea. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-biden-northkorea-analysi/biden-on-north-korea-fewer-summits-tighter-sanctions-same-standoff-idUSKBN25G2QO

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Load More...


All text on this site is copyright The Workers' Party of Britain. Established 2006