Tax avoidance – G8 will protect corporate power

G8 political leaders claim that controlling widespread tax avoidance by multinational corporations will form a key part of their next meeting. This will be qualified by saying that regulation requires international agreement. The real effort will be on the appearance of reform, while diluting the power to prevent tax avoidance. The substance of policy has been shaped by corporate representatives and their accountancy firms.

An article ‘Without curbing corporate power the G8 have no chance of combating tax avoidance‘ by Professor Prem Sikka, shows this influence in detail. For example there are policies such as the ‘Patent Box’ which allows companies to pay corporate tax at 10% instead of 22% by linking the profits to patents. It allows the beneficial ownership to be kept in tax havens.

Controlled foreign companies legislation allows companies controlled in the UK but resident overseas to be taxed at 5.25% instead of the full corporation tax rate.

General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR) which has been trailed as a measure to discourage organised tax avoidance by focusing on the economic substance rather than the legal form, has in practice been diluted to only affect extreme cases. Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have to apply a ‘double reasonableness’ test which will make effective action against corporate tax avoidance extremely difficult.

How did the tax avoiders achieve their policy success? They packed the working parties crafting the legislation with their representatives and consultants. The government defends this, saying that their ‘expertise’ was required. The names of the firms with representatives in the working parties are immediately recognisable for their views on tax. They include GlaxoSmithKline, Rolls Royce, Shell, Diageo, Tesco, Vodaphone, Rio Tinto, Kraft,  Cable and Wireless, HSBC, Prudential and Avia as well as the very consultants who advise them on tax avoidance, such as KPMG, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Ernst and Young and Deloitte.

 

The Workers’ Party Twitter Feed

GMB express concern over jobs of 146,000 staff; as Walmart sell Asda to billionaire Issa brothers & a private equity company. Asda is priced at £6.8 billion, Walmart will still hold a minority stake; £4b is to be borrowed.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/oct/02/asda-sold-to-billionaire-issa-brothers

Liberals & many on the 'left' exaggerate differences between Trump & Biden; click to see what would make a real difference.
There is no effective “freedom” in a society in which working people live in poverty & billionaires live like parasites.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10221826359541925&id=1045558919&sfnsn=scwspmo

Biden opposed moves to rebuild Afghanistan, advising a policy of fighting terrorism in the country. He also opposed withdrawal of US troops, which Trump carried out.
https://tolonews.com/afghanistan/biden’s-comments-rile-afghans-internationals

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Biden's regime will hold on to enclaves in the North East and work alongside Turkish invaders, continuing sanctions against the Syrian government. In general, Biden wants US global leadership, which he sees as being diminished by Trump's inconsistencies.
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/limited-and-constrained-the-biden-administration-and-the-prospects-of-a-syria-policy/

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Biden intends to have tighter sanctions on DPRK, and to have stricter preconditions with respect to engaging on talks. The Democrat's president also intends to strengthen an alliance against North Korea. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-biden-northkorea-analysi/biden-on-north-korea-fewer-summits-tighter-sanctions-same-standoff-idUSKBN25G2QO

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Load More...


All text on this site is copyright The Workers' Party of Britain. Established 2006