Savile and the cult of the expose

The exposure of Jimmy Savile as a paedophile at the heart of the Establishment is one of those very British things. Using celebrity, ‘charitable’ activity, the honours system and catholicism to mask his low life intentions for half a century, Savile played a reprehensible game against young people preying on the vulnerable and perverting the aspirations of the aspiring. He twisted a healthy national concern for the young into its opposite. His exposure reveals interesting things about the British Establishment. As always these are contradictory. Firstly, there is a genuine intention to get to the truth of the matter, to leave no stone unturned and eventually respect the voices of his victims. No expense will be spared in the process. Secondly, there is the lingering possibility that the pulling of the Newsnight expose may have been more than an editorial mistake. Who will fall on their sword if so? More interestingly the third element of this situation shows how the media frenzy and calls for justice and investigation into the pain caused by one man and possibly accomplices, soaks up great energy at a time when the systemic abuse of young people through poverty, unemployment and a new cultural violence towards them is at its highest ever. Savile occupied one of those curiously British interfaces where so called do gooders actually seriously abuse public services for their own gain. There are many privateers who do this at a gargantuan scale each day. Savile’s come uppance should not blind us to the structural predicament young people now face and the vandalism against our public services. No charity, TV programme, or celebrity can fix that.

The Workers’ Party Twitter Feed

Liberals & many on the 'left' exaggerate differences between Trump & Biden; click to see what would make a real difference.
There is no effective “freedom” in a society in which working people live in poverty & billionaires live like parasites.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10221826359541925&id=1045558919&sfnsn=scwspmo

Biden opposed moves to rebuild Afghanistan, advising a policy of fighting terrorism in the country. He also opposed withdrawal of US troops, which Trump carried out.
https://tolonews.com/afghanistan/biden’s-comments-rile-afghans-internationals

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Biden's regime will hold on to enclaves in the North East and work alongside Turkish invaders, continuing sanctions against the Syrian government. In general, Biden wants US global leadership, which he sees as being diminished by Trump's inconsistencies.
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/limited-and-constrained-the-biden-administration-and-the-prospects-of-a-syria-policy/

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Biden intends to have tighter sanctions on DPRK, and to have stricter preconditions with respect to engaging on talks. The Democrat's president also intends to strengthen an alliance against North Korea. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-biden-northkorea-analysi/biden-on-north-korea-fewer-summits-tighter-sanctions-same-standoff-idUSKBN25G2QO

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Load More...


All text on this site is copyright The Workers' Party of Britain. Established 2006