In the National Interest

Politicians are very fond of talking about ‘the national interest’, but whose national interest is at stake?

Pfizer, the world’s largest drug company, is about to take over the notionally British company AstraZeneca. Should we be surprised at their readiness to avoid paying tax in the US and now Britain? Two dozen US companies have already changed their tax residence through cross-border mergers since 2008. AstraZeneca itself has branches worldwide and shows no allegiance to any particular country.

We are witnessing sham politics played out by parliament’s social democrats. The reality is that EU laws prevent our government from protecting what is left of British industry. The cost of foreign ownership of much of British manufacturing, services and finance sectors is that British Governments have no control over British jobs.

Pfizer is more interested in buying up competitors in order to nullify competition. As an experienced asset stripper it will no doubt sell off AstraZeneca piecemeal for profit. Jobs will go. Pfizer’s record is criminal, falsifying evidence in clinical trials and making vast profits out of epidemics across the world. Large global corporations already control much of government’s activity. This take-over makes Pfizer even more powerful in any future safety and cost-effectiveness regulation. There would be little or no control over the cost to the NHS.

Why should any multinational create jobs in Britain when major shareholders’ interests only extend to the bottom line of a balance sheet? They have created another market in jobs. In the national interest of the British people we cannot afford to play by their rules.

The Workers’ Party Twitter Feed

GMB express concern over jobs of 146,000 staff; as Walmart sell Asda to billionaire Issa brothers & a private equity company. Asda is priced at £6.8 billion, Walmart will still hold a minority stake; £4b is to be borrowed.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/oct/02/asda-sold-to-billionaire-issa-brothers

Liberals & many on the 'left' exaggerate differences between Trump & Biden; click to see what would make a real difference.
There is no effective “freedom” in a society in which working people live in poverty & billionaires live like parasites.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10221826359541925&id=1045558919&sfnsn=scwspmo

Biden opposed moves to rebuild Afghanistan, advising a policy of fighting terrorism in the country. He also opposed withdrawal of US troops, which Trump carried out.
https://tolonews.com/afghanistan/biden’s-comments-rile-afghans-internationals

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Biden's regime will hold on to enclaves in the North East and work alongside Turkish invaders, continuing sanctions against the Syrian government. In general, Biden wants US global leadership, which he sees as being diminished by Trump's inconsistencies.
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/limited-and-constrained-the-biden-administration-and-the-prospects-of-a-syria-policy/

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Biden intends to have tighter sanctions on DPRK, and to have stricter preconditions with respect to engaging on talks. The Democrat's president also intends to strengthen an alliance against North Korea. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-biden-northkorea-analysi/biden-on-north-korea-fewer-summits-tighter-sanctions-same-standoff-idUSKBN25G2QO

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Load More...


All text on this site is copyright The Workers' Party of Britain. Established 2006