Biomedics Locked Out in Northampton Dispute

Seventy-eight biomedical scientists at Northampton General Hospital been locked out of their jobs after a dispute over new contracts. If they want to keep their jobs Unite members will have to sign contracts which could double their night time shifts and slash out of hours payments by 80%, which could mean losses of £6000 pa for some.

The dispute has been going on for a year now but it is now at the ‘sign or be sacked’ stage. Workers had voted to take action short of strikes, but management has put in security guards and is using agency and temporary staff.

Mick Orpin, Unite Regional Official has said, “Patient safety is being put at risk because the trust is trying to force through a new strategy without giving its loyal workforce a chance to voice their concerns. Inexperienced staff, who have never worked in blood transfusion, are being trained in an ad hoc manner to operate complex machines.

“The trust has already axed many posts; there are fears that staff shortages could mean our members are forced to work up to 25 night shifts in 14 weeks – almost doubling the trust’s new proposals. This will cause considerable hardship for those with family commitments and older members – something management has shut its eyes to.”

Recent negotiations have failed to get anywhere. There have been rumours in the past that NGH would like to privatise pathology, so it could be that this will provide management with an excuse.

For full details and a petition please go to http://www.unitetheunion.org/how-we-help/list-of-sectors/healthsector/healthsectorcampaigns/back-the-biomedical-scientists-at-ngh/

The Workers’ Party Twitter Feed

Liberals & many on the 'left' exaggerate differences between Trump & Biden; click to see what would make a real difference.
There is no effective “freedom” in a society in which working people live in poverty & billionaires live like parasites.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10221826359541925&id=1045558919&sfnsn=scwspmo

Biden opposed moves to rebuild Afghanistan, advising a policy of fighting terrorism in the country. He also opposed withdrawal of US troops, which Trump carried out.
https://tolonews.com/afghanistan/biden’s-comments-rile-afghans-internationals

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Biden's regime will hold on to enclaves in the North East and work alongside Turkish invaders, continuing sanctions against the Syrian government. In general, Biden wants US global leadership, which he sees as being diminished by Trump's inconsistencies.
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/limited-and-constrained-the-biden-administration-and-the-prospects-of-a-syria-policy/

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Biden intends to have tighter sanctions on DPRK, and to have stricter preconditions with respect to engaging on talks. The Democrat's president also intends to strengthen an alliance against North Korea. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-biden-northkorea-analysi/biden-on-north-korea-fewer-summits-tighter-sanctions-same-standoff-idUSKBN25G2QO

Arfasprout@arfasprout

@theworkerorguk Which international conflicts has biden spoken more violently than trump on? Evidence please.

Load More...


All text on this site is copyright The Workers' Party of Britain. Established 2006